Declared scope
Actions and intended outcomes are expressed before evaluation, so the decision boundary is explicit rather than implied.
CONTROLLED AI-AGENT OPERATIONS
Agents Align is advancing bounded, evidence-aware AI-agent control from an initial proof of concept into structured validation toward production deployment.
THE APPROACH
The central question is not only what an agent can do. It is whether a particular action, in a particular context, is justified and within scope.
Actions and intended outcomes are expressed before evaluation, so the decision boundary is explicit rather than implied.
Missing, ambiguous, or conflicting evidence should lead to a halt or review—not a confident guess.
Decision receipts make it possible to inspect what was evaluated and why a proposal was constrained.
DESIGN PRINCIPLES
Agents Align is being developed around boundaries that resist silent expansion of authority.
Governing rules are a prerequisite to any later assessment; they are not a score an agent can negotiate around.
An evaluation path is not an authorization path. Assessments must not quietly become permission to act.
When evidence is insufficient, the system is designed to preserve the decision for accountable review.
VALIDATION PATH
Agents Align has completed its initial research and proof-of-concept phase and is entering structured validation toward production deployment. The current focus is demonstrating controlled evaluation and refusal boundaries under defined conditions—not claiming autonomous operational authority.
AZURE VALIDATION
Agents Align has been deployed to a closed Azure Container Apps staging environment. In a controlled end-to-end validation, an authenticated connector running outside Azure sent a signed, minimized observation over mTLS to the Azure-hosted API boundary.
Current status: this is closed staging, not a live customer service. Intake is disabled, no customer connector is active, and no customer data is accepted. The validation demonstrates an Azure-hosted integration path for a registered external API client while production persistence and private-network controls remain gated pilot work.
VALIDATION & BENCHMARKS
A deterministic three-agent governance corpus tests whether constraints hold when agents compete, proposals conflict, or a request attempts to escape its declared scope.
What was tested: undeclared external scope, irreversible changes, secret-access attempts, proposed replacement of a bounded action, contradictory or missing evidence, and cross-agent receipt substitution.
What the result means: In this controlled corpus, out-of-scope cases were denied or routed to review; an eligibility receipt from one agent could not be reused by another. The benchmark is research evidence for boundary enforcement, not a security certification or a claim of production readiness.
GUIDED EVALUATION
Choose an illustrative scenario to see how declared scope, evidence, and constraints shape a decision.
This interactive preview uses synthetic, pre-defined scenarios. It makes no network calls, executes no actions, and grants no authority.
Request a guided demoSelected: Out-of-scope request
Runs only in this browser with synthetic scenarios. Do not enter customer data, credentials, or system details.
EVALUATION RESULT
Choose a synthetic scenario and run the evaluation to inspect its bounded decision receipt.
Illustrative receipt AA-DEMO-READY
The guided demo is an evaluation experience, not a production authorization service and not an invitation to connect live systems.
PARTNERSHIPS & VALIDATION
We welcome conversations with enterprise technology teams, validation partners, and organizations exploring accountable AI-agent deployment.
Contact Agents Align